Implementing the FDA’s fillable forms has been challenging for many small companies. While the advantages of using the forms are clear, many companies find the process daunting. Fortunately, there are some easy paths to implementation that do not require large-scale process or system changes.
Background
First, it’s important to remember why the forms are useful. For companies using the Electronic Submissions Gateway (ESG), the forms provide a way for submissions to get to reviewers without requiring human intervention. The gateway is programmed to look for files named 1571.pdf or 356h.pdf. If those files were created with the fillable forms, the gateway reads the application and sequence numbers from the form and automatically routes the submission. This is the fastest way to get submissions from your company to reviewers.
If you don’t use the fillable forms, your submissions end up in the Electronic Document Room, where someone has to open up the pdf file to figure out the submission and sequence numbers. This process can delay delivery of your submission to reviewers by up to a week.
So how best to implement the forms? There are 2 basic approaches: use Acrobat self-sign certificates, or send unsigned forms with a scanned version of the printed form. I’ll describe how each approach works.
Fillable Form Plus Scanned Form With Signature
If you are uncomfortable digitally signing the form, you can send an unsigned fillable form along with a scanned version of the signed, printed form. Both forms go in the same place in m1. The fillable form needs to be named 1571.pdf or 356h.pdf. The scanned form can be named something like scanned-form.pdf, but the name must not contain the form number.
Fillable Form With Electronic Signature
To streamline this process, consider using Acrobat self-sign certificates. These certificates enable anyone with Acrobat to add their digital signature to a document. Before you begin you have to send a non-repudiation letter to the agency stating that your company recognizes digital signatures as the equivalent of paper signatures. This is a simple letter, but you may want to discuss its contents and implications with your legal and QA departments before sending.
To implement the process, you go to each potential signatory’s computer and help them create a certificate from within Acrobat (it varies slightly depending on which version of Acrobat you’re using). The signers should save a copy of the signature file on their laptop (in case they need to sign something while traveling) and a second copy in a secure location on your network. They need to use a password that they will remember–they have to use the password each time they sign a document.
Once you’ve set this up it’s very easy to actually sign a document. A signer clicks on the signature block on the form, selects their certificate file, enters their password, and selects a reason for signing from the popup list. The whole thing takes only slightly longer than a paper signature.
For more information on digital signatures and fillable forms, check out this FDA guidance: Electronic Signatures Guidance
Hi Monte,
Excellent, informative website. In regards to FDA fillable forms, is there a presentation or document that lists the current validation checks that are performed on the Form when submitted (e.g. verifying Application Number on Form to Application Number on us-regional.xml file)? I noticed that you mentioned that the Gateway is programmed to recognize the 356h and 1571 form (as I’ve also heard in multiple DIA presentations), but wanted to know if you knew of a document that contained this information.
Again, great blogs, keep up the good work.
Johnny
Johnny,
The FDA performs 3 levels of validation checks. The first is the Automated Submission Receipt (ASR) which is where the fillable form is examined and the application number verified. I have only seen this system discussed in agency presentations at eCTD conferences. I don’t have a reference that explains it fully, but check out the links, below.
Monte
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/AbbreviatedNewDrugApplicationANDAGenerics/UCM166274.pdf
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/AbbreviatedNewDrugApplicationANDAGenerics/UCM166277.pdf
http://theectdsummit.com/summit/?p=262
Has anyone seen script errors with fillable form 2253. I can open this form (once filled in) using Acrobat 9 Pro, but other people using Acrobat 7 cannot. The scripting errors, I believe are java related, and the form properties say it is compatible with Acrobat 7. Do you know of any workarounds or debugging, or is this an FDA known issue.
Thanks!
Sharon
P.S. This is an outstanding blog – great info.
Thanks for your comment, Sharon. I was unaware of the issue, and couldn’t find any mention of it online. To test it out, I downloaded the 2253 form on a Windows 7 machine with Acrobat 9 and had no problems. When I downloaded the form on a Windows XP machine with Acrobat 7 I got a number of script errors. I was able to fill in the form fields and save the document using Acrobat 7, but the script errors didn’t give me a lot of confidence that it was working correctly–even though it appeared to be OK. The form is in PDF 1.6 format, which should work with Acrobat 7, but clearly there is a problem.
I recommend that you contact the agency to inform them of the problem and ask them to update the form with one that works correctly in Acrobat 7. You can contact the electronic submissions support team at esub@fda.hhs.gov. It probably wouldn’t hurt to copy DDMAC and/or APLB to let them know as well.
Monte
what if we put letters such as “NDA” or “ANDA” in application number field on the fillable 356h, will ASR reject the submission since it doesn’t match with the application “number” on the xml?
I would recommend just including the number in the form field. If you want a more authoritative answer you should send your question to esub@fda.hhs.gov, which is the address for the electronic submissions group at FDA. They are very responsive and very helpful.
Monte